The 2025 NFL Draft class is beginning to take form, and meaning we’re getting a clearer image of a number of the prime prospects and the place teams with essentially the most depth.
The prime prospect on the board is Colorado’s Travis Hunter, a uncommon expertise with the potential to begin on the NFL stage as both a large receiver or cornerback. After Hunter, Michigan standouts Mason Graham and Will Johnson, Arizona’s Tetairoa McMillan and Boise State’s Ashton Jeanty are a number of the premier gamers on this draft class.
The working again, tight finish and offensive deal with positions appear to be the deepest and strongest on the offensive aspect of the ball. On protection, the sting defender group is as deep as we’ve seen in a number of years, dominating the projected prime 50. There are additionally extra impression defensive backs this 12 months than a 12 months in the past, with loads of choices on all three days of the draft, particularly on Days 2 and three.
Here are PFF’s prime 250 draft prospects within the 2025 NFL Draft, together with some preliminary scouting notes courtesy of lead draft analyst Trevor Sikkema.
For the complete rating of draft prospects, together with their three-year participant grades and place rankings, click on right here.
Click right here for extra draft instruments:
NFL Draft Big Board | Mock Draft Simulator | NCAA Premium Stats
1. WR/CB Travis Hunter, Colorado
Strengths:
• Impressive prime velocity/restoration velocity
• Height/size is a giant plus for him in press protection
• Some of the very best ball expertise you may ever see in a defensive again
• Has a knack for baiting QBs and making them pay in zone protection
• Elite zone-coverage participant in each manner
Weaknesses:
• Foot velocity could be a tad delayed as a result of longer legs
• Lack of weight does present up when tackling and hand-fighting
• Can be a bit uncontrolled at occasions
• Could stand to enhance true anticipation in man protection
2. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Arizona
Strengths:
• Height stands out on tape earlier than the primary snap. He has a difference-making dimension.
• Smooth, lengthy strides
• Impressive acceleration for his dimension
• Rarely see false steps in his launch
• Comfortable maximizing an enormous catch radius
• Just two drops on 136 targets
Weaknesses:
• Very slender construct
• Very low separation scores vs. single protection in 2023 (38 contested targets)
• Naturally more durable for him to sink/flip his hips for comebacks/curls
• Lacks the mass to be a constant blocker
3. DI Mason Graham, Michigan
Strengths:
• Elite first step explosiveness
• Excellent bend and suppleness for an inside participant
• Fast and highly effective palms
• Devastating push-pull transfer
• Strong participant who can maintain the road
Weaknesses:
• Arms look like on the shorter aspect
4. HB Ashton Jeanty, Boise State
Strengths:
• Dense, compact body for good middle of gravity/steadiness
• Natural mushy palms within the receiving sport
• Becomes a playmaker after the catch
• Does not draw back from contact
• Excellent one-cut imaginative and prescient behind zone-blocking ideas
Weaknesses:
• Overall dimension makes go blocking a troublesome process, however he’s keen to do it
• Vision in man/hole state of affairs will not be decisive sufficient
• Can generally shimmy an excessive amount of when setting a defender up in house
5. CB Will Johnson, Michigan
Strengths:
• Change of course potential is that of a a lot smaller nook –
• but over 6 foot and over 200 kilos
• Versatile to play left or proper aspect. He can shadow-cover WR1s
• Very good understanding of leverages
• Smooth when passing off receivers and choosing up gamers in zone
• Can play confidently within the slot if his task is lined up there
• Fluid transitions from backpedal to shuffle to full stride
• He understands comprise in run matches
Weaknesses:
• Has some inconsistent/ineffective timing with punches in press
• Top velocity is nice however does not look like within the prime tier with restoration
• Sloppy with tackling makes an attempt in 2024
6. ED Abdul Carter, Penn State
Strengths:
• Rare athlete for the place
• Natural explosiveness and bend are each elite
• Willingness to play bodily regardless of lighter weight
• Pass rushes like a basketball guard; cross-over model (basketball background)
Weaknesses:
• Has a small false step (may cowl much more floor off the snap)
• Need to get extra exact with palms to remain clear throughout rushes; improved in 2024 with quick arm-over transfer
7. S Malaki Starks, Georgia
Strengths:
• Lower weight quantity, however a well-built security
• Long wingspan for go breakups
• Top velocity could be very spectacular (sprinter background)
• Constant pre-snap communicator
• Smooth, fluid hips to maximise vary in deep protection
• Sound tackler with coordination and power; low missed deal with price
• Elite ball expertise
Weaknesses:
• Movements can look a tad uncontrolled at occasions
• Can be somewhat too aggressive in his pursuit angles
8. T Will Campbell, LSU
Strengths:
• Has a extra slim base however typically sturdy and balanced
• Body actions are fast, compact and exact; all the time in management
• Hands are up and lively, all the time able to strike with energy
• Patient blocker
• Adequate energy for the professionals
Weaknesses:
• Higher pre-snap stance results in a excessive pas stage when participating
• Arm size may very well be shorter than his 6-foot-6 body suggests
• Has some lack of flexibility in his groin to stretch his kicks/shield his outdoors shoulder
9. WR Luther Burden III, Missouri
Strengths:
• Great all-around athlete
• Natural playmaker with the ball in his palms, evidenced by excessive YAC scores
• Very elusive after the catch
• Good steadiness for YAC
• Adequate lengthy velocity for NFL
• Fast footwork for efficient releases
Weaknesses:
• Can get pushed round some within the blocking sport
• Doesn’t all the time assault the ball within the air
10. ED Nic Scourton, Texas A&M
Strengths:
• Carries 280 kilos very properly for an edge who may be OLB or DE
• Experience taking part in each the appropriate and left aspect of the road
• Many go rush strikes already really feel second nature
• Savviness to “get skinny” between blockers
• Great eyes for the place the ball goes
• Natural intuition to swipe his palms and keep clear
• Comfortable shallow zone dropping from OLB spot
Weaknesses:
• Loses edge comprise by crashing down too usually (may very well be what he is taught)
• Isn’t as violent in his run protection persistently as he may very well be
11. T Kelvin Banks Jr., Texas
Strengths:
• Flexible hips and huge base for a robust, huge stance
• Foot velocity/explosiveness is top-tier
• Can transfer whereas in a squatted place (low pad stage)
• Great second-level/house blocker
• Natural athleticism provides him excessive zone-blocking potential
• Really spectacular steadiness for a participant 320-plus kilos
Weaknesses:
• Height hints at shorter arm size, which exhibits on tape
• Not an imposing run blocker. He lacks displacement to maneuver when sq. with a defensive lineman
• Too vulnerable to push-pull strikes
• Hands may very well be extra exact and on the prepared
12. QB Jalen Milroe, Alabama
Strengths:
• Not simply escapability however a real dual-threat athlete
• Good sufficient athlete to power missed tackles in house
• Twitchy athleticism evident in throwing movement velocity
• Can present very nice contact/accuracy on deep passes
• Experienced RPO quarterback
Weaknesses:
• Accuracy/decision-making variance is massive proper now — loads of spotlight performs but in addition loads of regrettable ones
• Holds the ball low and unfastened in his stance
• Accuracy can dip when he takes velocity off his throw for shorter distances
• Can battle seeing non-primary defenders
• Time to throw/sacks taken is way too excessive, even for “you are taking the unhealthy with the great.”
13. LB Jalon Walker, Georgia
Strengths:
• Natural go rusher off the sting
• Adequate dimension to play ILB/OLB within the NFL
• Explosive first step in all instructions
• Powerful higher physique to stack blockers at punch
• Long arms for a 6-2 body
Weaknesses:
• Does not have lots of expertise/success in protection
• His sport at present lacks lateral quickness wanted for off-ball LB work
• Lacks true mastery of go rush strikes as a result of time cut up on and off the ball
14. QB Cameron Ward, Miami (FL)
Strengths:
• True sidearm launch that’s David Carr-esque
• Experienced and profitable middle-of-field passer
• “Never say die” kind of playmaker with good escapability
• Adequate arm power for the NFL stage
• Impressive and pure contact passer
Weaknesses:
• Holds the ball beneath the shoulders in his stance, which makes for an extended launch
• Side arm launch is unique however feels too various throw-to-throw
• Accuracy numbers are excessive, however that’s extra as a result of quantity; true ball placement is not constant
• Ball safety (fumbling) wants to enhance
15. T Josh Simmons, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Stance and base is huge and robust pre
• and post-snap
• Fantastic steadiness; can slide and mirror whereas in a squatted place
• Consistently low pad stage at contact
• Adequate size for OT within the NFL
• Footwork is fast; slide size is ample
• Competitive participant who performs by means of the whistle
• Really good footwork when anchoring
Weaknesses:
• Hands have a low start line
• Doesn’t have true displacement power within the run sport
• Lower weight makes anchoring more durable (although good knee bend and steadiness assist)
16. WR Emeka Egbuka, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Very fast, managed participant
• High separation scores as a result of elite physique management/velocity management
• Willing, feisty blocker
• High IQ participant who is aware of tips on how to assault leverages and discover house
• Good steadiness by means of contact for yards after the catch
Weaknesses:
• Lack of dimension does restrict the efficacy of blocking talents
17. T Aireontae Ersery, Minnesota
Strengths:
• Adequate dimension, weight distribution and size for the NFL
• Light on his toes for a participant of his dimension
• Explosive first step and prime velocity for 330 kilos
• Pass professional is fairly superior with kick slide and handwork
• Good footwork when anchoring
• Impact zone-run blocker
Weaknesses:
• High-waisted participant. It is more durable for him to get his butt down in his stance, so he’ll bend on the waist for contact
• Weight is just too far on his toes proper now
• Could have higher judgment in opposition to stunts
18. T Wyatt Milum, West Virginia
Strengths:
• Natural athlete who can hold his toes below him with steadiness when taking contact
• Adequate dimension and size to play deal with within the professionals
• Really sturdy grip power
• Sound, constant anchoring approach
• Reliable run blocking in each man and zone
• Smart, conscious participant
Weaknesses:
• First step is slower; struggles to catch up in opposition to velocity rushers
• Weight is a bit too on his toes; leaning into contact will get him in bother if he isn’t full sq. with the defender
• Appears to have some stiffness in his hips that forestalls him from getting his butt down in his stance for steadiness and leverage
19. CB Benjamin Morrison, Notre Dame
Strengths:
• Appears to have very lengthy arms, even for a CB at 6-foot
• Hands are up and lively in press protection
• Quick to transition from shuffle to full strides
• Good consciousness and timing for getting his head round to search out the ball
• Willing run defender
• Very excessive IQ participant
Weaknesses:
• Strength is considerably of a priority with getting off blocks and tackling
• Start/cease potential is nice, particularly for his dimension, however not top-tier
• Can get grab-y on WRs to stay with them on comeback routes
20. TE Colston Loveland, Michigan
Strengths:
• Very spectacular athlete, even for a lighter weight tight finish
• Natural go catcher
• Crisp, explosive routes
• Has change-of-direction flexibility to run routes with a number of breaks
• Has the body/size to dam secondary gamers properly; some linebackers
Weaknesses:
• Shows fundamentals as a blocker however lacks the true dimension to deal with defensive ends
• Catch proportion may very well be larger
• Could be extra artistic after the catch
21. QB Shedeur Sanders, Colorado
Strengths:
• Strong, huge base with good dimension within the decrease half to generate throwing energy from his legs
• Repeatable, essentially sound throwing movement (excessive launch level helps make up for smaller top)
• Good zip on passes inside 25 yards
• Mental and bodily toughness to step up and take successful whereas delivering a throw
• Good really feel/anticipation for attacking zone
• Slippery within the backfield regardless of lack of mobility
• Not afraid to look bottom of the formation on scrambles
Weaknesses:
• Ball velocity can die on him within the air past 40 yards
• Release velocity is average-to-below-average
• Arm power is common for NFL requirements
• Doesn’t all the time end throwing movement throughout the physique
• Below-average mobility (excessive sack price)
22. T Cameron Williams, Texas
Strengths:
• Excellent dimension for an offensive deal with
• Ideal arm size that appears longer than his 6-5 listed top
• First step explosiveness is noteworthy for his weight
• Strong grip as soon as he locks on
• Good eyes and really feel for the place hazard is coming from
• Has a finisher’s mentality
Weaknesses:
• Can explode properly for his dimension, however you’ll be able to inform the toes are heavy
• Punch timing is not all the time constant, particularly when gamers come proper at him
• Must clear up penalties (may very well be an absence of begins)
23. WR Isaiah Bond, Texas
Strengths:
• Top-tier athlete
• Knows he must hand-fight vertical releases, not simply run by them each time
• Not afraid to place his physique on the road for catches
• WIll make robust catches by means of contact regardless of his smaller dimension
• Great stop-and-start physique management
Weaknesses:
• Releases and routes lack nuance
• Needs to know tips on how to cease when he finds house
24. ED Mykel Williams, Georgia
Strengths:
• Great construct for an edge participant; weight and size are pro-caliber
• Has a violent and quick arm-over/swing transfer when attacking inside
• Good understanding of some great benefits of his arm size
• His first step is explosive and might cowl a ton of floor
• Great motor that performs to the whistle
• Strong, dependable run defender
Weaknesses:
• Consistently one of many final linemen out of his stance
• Has a false step in his go rush reps that may very well be cleaned up
• Hands are lively however may very well be extra exact in go rush
• Eyes for the ball may enhance
25. DI Kenneth Grant, Michigan
Strengths:
• Unique quickness for a participant of his dimension
• Quick to get to counters
• Active palms in passing lanes for batted passes
• Just a very good athlete for a participant of his dimension
Weaknesses:
• Could prioritize power extra at his dimension
• Gives up leverage and performs excessive too usually
26. ED Shemar Stewart, Texas A&M
Strengths:
• Imposing dimension, even for NFL requirements
• Top-tier explosiveness at his dimension
• Speed to energy may be dominant
• Violent palms to disengage
• Impressive potential to nook for his dimension
Weaknesses:
• Has a constant false step that must be cleaned up
• He lets tackles get their palms on him first
• Pass rush plans want refinement and extra finesse
• Too reliant on the “see the ball, get the ball” mentality. He must anticipate
• Must play with higher steadiness
27. HB Omarion Hampton, North Carolina
Strengths:
• Built like an NFL again in measurables, weight distribution and athleticism
• Relishes within the bodily points of the place
• Wants to erase individuals in go professional
• Elite energy in his decrease half for leg drive by means of contract and explosiveness in house
Weaknesses:
• Inconsistent mix of persistence and hesitancy behind the LOS
• Overeager to get upfield, at occasions; may stand to be extra affected person for his blockers at second stage
28. WR Elic Ayomanor, Stanford
Strengths:
• Has the body and willingness to be an efficient blocker by means of the whistle
• Explosive athlete who can speed up rapidly with prime velocity
• Conscious of launch approach to assault completely different leverages
• Showcases excessive soccer IQ and consciousness for only a one-year starter
Weaknesses:
• Hands may very well be stronger, particularly in visitors
• Takes him additional time to cease or actually change course
29. HB Kaleb Johnson, Iowa
Strengths:
• Strong north-to-south runner between the tackles
• Realy good burst and prime velocity for his weight
• Has the steadiness to shrug off arm tackles for YAC
• Good imaginative and prescient, particularly behind ZBS
• Constantly reducing to search out open house
Weaknesses:
• Not a lot expertise in any respect as a receiver
• Upfield urgency can result in not letting blocks arrange
30. HB Quinshon Judkins, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Quick, explosive footwork within the backfield to leap gaps and speed up when he sees house
• Willing, essentially sound go protector
• Strong core, spectacular steadiness for yards after contact
• Long velocity seems above common for the NFL stage
• Plays with stage of competitiveness/toughness
• One fumble in over 500 carries from 2022-2023
Weaknesses:
• Was not relied on a lot within the passing sport
• Sometimes, his weight can get somewhat too far over his toes, and he can lose steadiness
• He has excessive pass-blocking potential, however there are occasions he dips his head too far and drops his eyes
31. TE Tyler Warren, Penn State
Strengths:
• Has the body to play in-line, as a wingback and fullback
• Long arms are advantageous for catch radius and when blocking
• Hold up properly versus energy in opposition to most defensive ends
• Very sturdy participant
• Not afraid of the bodily points of the sport
• Big-time manufacturing improve as a receiver in 2024
Weaknesses:
• A bit stiffer to alter course, which limits his route tree
32. DI Tyleik Williams, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Compact, highly effective stance pre-snap
• Has the body to play each nostril and 3-tech
• Explosive first step to shoot gaps, create energy and cross face
• Hand velocity, precision and objective a lot improved in 2024
Weaknesses:
• Tends to pop up rapidly to lose leverage
• Loses floor a bit an excessive amount of when taking over combo blocks
• Does not have sufficient go rush strikes/counters
33. CB Trey Amos, Mississippi
Strengths:
• Adequate dimension to play on the subsequent stage
• An excellent athlete in all aspects with a monitor and multi-sport background
• Very excessive compelled incompletion price for every of the final three seasons
• Very good protection instincts
• Likes to get his palms on receivers and be bodily to remain on them
• Very lively palms in press, on the breakpoint, and on the catch level
• Arm size seems to be above the fiftieth percentile
• Good power to tear off WR blocks
Weaknesses:
• Top velocity will not “wow” you regardless of sprinter background
• Lacks fundamentals and a hearth for tackling (tackles excessive too usually)
34. ED James Pearce Jr., Tennessee
Strengths:
• Very twitchy participant with an explosive first step
• Quick off the ball with snap response
• Very quick palms with excessive potential for effectiveness
• Decent speed-to-power punch, given his low weight
• Spot drop protection is not his sturdy go well with, however he has the motion expertise for it
• Good anticipation for snap rely/applicable pre-snap shifts
Weaknesses:
• Light weight makes it simpler to lock him up/end him to the bottom
• Not a lot flexibility to play him wherever inside 5-tech
• Lacks pass-rush nuance and approach
35. CB Shavon Revel, East Carolina
Strengths:
• Very explosive athlete, particularly for his dimension
• Top velocity shall be within the prime percentile
• Willing and bodily run defender
• Footwork is quick sufficient to match WR actions, particularly in press protection
• Willy bully you in press protection
Weaknesses:
• Explosive, however uncontrolled at occasions
• Anticipation and spacing continues to be inconsistent
• Has the power and size to get off blocks however wants to hurry up getting clear
• High compelled incompletion price however missing takeaway coordination
36. DI T.J. Sanders, South Carolina
Strengths:
• Quick palms to have interaction and get off blocks
• Plus arm size for an inside participant
• Competitive third-down participant
• Explosive first step laterally and linearly
• Has some twitch for a man who’s 295
• Long arms for PBUs
Weaknesses:
• Gives up leverage rapidly post-snap
• Can get overzealous to shoot a niche in run protection
• Does not maintain up properly in opposition to doubles
• Could end tackles/sacks higher
37. ED LT Overton, Alabama
Strengths:
• Well-build defensive lineman; excessive weight, however not slowly and distributed appropriately for all-around power
• Powerful edge rusher who can pack at puch at contact/tackling
• Powerful palms for an efficient membership transfer
• Surprising flexibility to show the nook at his dimension
• Build-up velocity is terrifying
• Strong stack and shed potential
• Can keep pad stage when shuffling the road
Weaknesses:
• Better run defender than go rusher
• Struggles to get off blocks cleanly persistently
• Needs to develop counters for when linemen actually get palms on him
• Hand placement may very well be extra constant to maximise leverage in run protection/anchoring
38. CB Jahdae Barron, Texas
Strengths:
• Adequate dimension and power for run protection/tackling from slot
• Good closing velocity
• Power and power to work by means of blocks for tackles
• Experience and luxury on the linebacker stage
• Good really feel for spot zone protection
• Good eyes and anticipation regardless of the place he’s lined up
• Versatility for any DB spot
Weaknesses:
• Hips somewhat slower to flip to match route breaks
• Can get uncomfortable when his again is to the ball (go interference); higher in 2024
• Top velocity is best than acceleration
39. DI Walter Nolen, Mississippi
Strengths:
• Well constructed participant
• Incredibly sturdy, particularly with momentum; uncooked power and explosiveness are evident persistently
• Has the construct to play each defensive finish and defensive deal with
• Good effort to the whistle
Weaknesses:
• Looked much less uncontrolled in 2024, however nonetheless must be extra purposeful in what he does
• Lacks a go-to go rush transfer
40. ED Landon Jackson, Arkansas
Strengths:
• Difference-making construct; top, weight and size above ninetieth percentile for edge
• Adequate power to carry the road and tackle pulling blockers
• Surprising flexibility (at occasions) for his dimension
• Long arms make for an intensive tackling radius
Weaknesses:
• Injury historical past that features two ACL accidents (one from highschool, one from early school)
• Larger body limits twitch/C.O.D.
• The first step is respectable, however velocity is extra build-up
41. ED Princely Umanmielen, Mississippi
Strengths:
• Twitchy participant with good C.O.D. motion
• Naturally and successfully will get throughout the face of OL
• Longer arms than his top signifies
• Has the motion expertise to identify drop in protection
• Has velocity to catch RBs from the bottom
Weaknesses:
• Footwork may very well be cleaned up; toes are angled, pushes off again foot on the snap, not all the time set on the snap
• Feels erratic at occasions; actions may use extra precision
• Needs to be extra constant snap-to-snap
42. DI Omarr Norman-Lott, Tennessee
Strengths:
• Explosive and highly effective 3-tech defensive deal with
• Natural 4-point stance rusher with nice leverage off snap
• Impressive higher physique power to bench press lineman again
• Can maintain up properly in opposition to double groups
• Surprising flexibility and bend for an inside participant
Weaknesses:
• Needs to make a rip transfer extra of second nature when taking pictures gaps
• Needs to go in with extra of a pass-rush plan
• Freelances an excessive amount of as a run defender
• Plays on the bottom somewhat greater than you would like
43. LB Jihaad Campbell, Alabama
Strengths:
• Ideal dimension and size for an off-ball backer on the NFL stage
• Long strides make pursuit a breeze
• Viable velocity rush possibility as a pass-rushing OLB
• Long arms for batted passes and go breakups
Weaknesses:
• Anticipation continues to be a tick gradual for the place the ball is/goes
• Still growing that “really feel” in protection; he has to see it to make a play on it proper now
• Could play with a bit extra urgency/at a better velocity
• Tends to goal excessive when tackling
44. T Grey Zabel, North Dakota State
Strengths:
• Top-tier grip power
• Very good at lining his tackets up between the shoulders, whether or not on the line or on the hoof
• Great athlete for an offensive lineman
• Explosive first step to thrive in a zone-blocking scheme
• Leg drive is fixed and efficient
• Great core power to take care of blocks but not yield holding penalties
• Flexibility to sink his hips in his stance regardless of 6-6 body
Weaknesses:
• Weight profile is low for an OT, even decrease for an IOL; must placed on weight
• Most of his misplaced reps come from edge rushers beating him inside
45. ED Ashton Gillotte, Louisville
Strengths:
• Good weight within the decrease half for a powerful leg drive
• Very sturdy participant total
• Good first step explosiveness; no false steps
• Has a bodily mentality wanted for trench play
• Impactful stunt participant as crasher or looper
• Hands are violent when he throws any type of chop or swipe
Weaknesses:
• Likes to push his blockers however must get off blocks faster
• Hands are quick however not exact
• Arm size may very well be beneath the brink for some groups
• Somewhat restricted flexibility for bend and C.O.D.
46. ED Jack Sawyer, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Good eyes, timing and power to stack and shed in run protection
• First step is persistently from the entrance foot in his stance (2-pt or 3-pt)
• Fundamentally sound participant who is never out of place or with wasted actions
• Strong higher physique to execute push and stack maneuvers in go rush and run protection
Weaknesses:
• Needs a deeper go rush bag
• Doesn’t seem to have imposing power
• Not a flexible go rusher on the skin
• An excellent athlete however appears to lack eye-popping explosiveness to threaten outdoors shoulders
47. CB Darien Porter, Iowa State
Strengths:
• Very alluring size for the place
• Really clean and pure mover, given his top and size
• His receiver background makes him a pure on the catch level
• Lighter body makes him simpler to dam, however he understands taking over blocks and funneling ball carriers again inside
• Hip flips and acceleration are top-tier for a 6-foot-2-plus defensive again
Weaknesses:
• Handled fairly simply in opposition to pulling OL and even TEs in run protection
• Lack of reps as a CB does present up in anticipation, particularly when approaching to deal with
• Punch in press could be a bit mistimed (inexperience factor)
48. HB TreVeyon Henderson, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Gets as much as full velocity in a short time
• Fast footwork to power missed tackles and select working lanes behind man- and gap-blocking ideas
• Very agile again
• Can steadiness momentum properly at excessive speeds
Weaknesses:
• Not lots of physique density to energy by means of full tackles
• Isn’t as decisive behind zone blocking as he’s behind man/hole blocking
• Tends to wish to bounce to the sideline somewhat an excessive amount of
• Has the agility for rote working however not an excessively pure pass-catcher
49. ED JT Tuimoloau, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Powerful first step with few, if any, false steps
• Can get low and highly effective in pre-snap stance (4-pt and 3-pt)
• Strong leg drive that strikes OL past first contact
• Consistent hand placement with good leverage
• Swipes are quick and exact to maintain him clear when crossing the face
• Fearless to crash down in opposition to pulling linemen
Weaknesses:
• Ability to nook is restricted as a result of lack of velocity and bend
• Anticipation could be a tick gradual at occasions
• Can battle in opposition to OTs with lengthy arms
50. ED Kyle Kennard, South Carolina
Strengths:
• Explosive first step; good speed-to-power rusher
• Fast first step turns into good pursuit prime velocity
• Very quick palms make him robust to remain in entrance of
• Looks to have plus arm size for the place
• Good bag of preliminary go rush strikes
Weaknesses:
• Naturally rushes excessive from a 2-point stance
• Needs to develop extra counters when the primary transfer fails
51. HB Dylan Sampson, Tennessee
52. S Kamari Ramsey, USC
Strengths:
• High IQ; exhibits a strong really feel for the sport
• Fast to anticipate and set off downhill
• Can play within the slot as a result of dependable run protection
• Reliable tackler with potential for large hits
Weaknesses:
• Can take poor run-defense angles
• Seems to dive at ankles greater than you’d suppose
53. ED Donovan Ezeiruaku, Boston College
Strengths:
• The first step is each explosive and clean
• Quick, second nature to make use of the rip transfer as a finisher to different strikes
• Knows his arm size may be a bonus and makes use of it persistently
• Maximizes leverage to make up for lack of weight
• Consistent, dependable effort
• Good eyes and anticipation for the ball
Weaknesses:
• Tough for him to tackle pullers and lead blockers
• Pursuit velocity and explosiveness seem average-to-below-average
54. TE Mason Taylor, LSU
Strengths:
• Well-built, athletic body
• Has the dimensions and expertise to play in-line in addition to within the slot
• Light as a blocker however does have good hand placement and approach
Weaknesses:
• Lack of weight exhibits up when preventing within the trenches
• Slender construct for an in-line participant; would possibly must placed on about 10 lbs.
55. TE Gunnar Helm, Texas
Strengths:
• Good core and grip power to wall off defensive linemen as a blocker
• Balanced receiver after the catch
Weaknesses:
-Struggles in opposition to many highly effective edge rushers
• Could use extra “pop” as a blocker
56. ED Mike Green, Marshall
Strengths:
• Adequate size for the place on the NFL stage (lengthy arms)
• Well construct, balanced. You do not see him on the bottom or knocked off his toes
• Explosive first step to instantly threaten tackles’ steadiness and quickness
• Good lateral quickness to shoot gaps inside
• Consistently bodily
Weaknesses:
• Launching off his entrance foot may assist when attacking outdoors
• Worst sport got here in opposition to the very best competitors in OSU
57. S Kevin Winston Jr., Penn State
Strengths:
• Good top/size for man protection and to disrupt the catch level
• Great downhill velocity
• Physical participant who can flip his velocity into energy
• Has some flexibility and bend to him when blitzing
Weaknesses:
• Slender construct, however that does not appear to restrict his tackling efficacy
• Can get fooled by play motion and misdirection performs as a result of a extra aggressive strategy
• Lacking anticipation in protection; an excessive amount of reacting after the transfer is made
58. ED Jared Ivey, Mississippi
59. WR Xavier Restrepo, Miami (FL)
Strengths:
• Good all-around athlete with mix of power, quickness and physique management
• Looks sturdy for his dimension
• Good steadiness to take and dish out contact
• Precise route runner with sharp actions to create separation
• Strong, dependable palms
Weaknesses:
• Lacks distinction making prime velocity
• Limited YAC participant, even from the slot
• Hand placement is hit-and-miss when blocking
• Limited expertise versus press
60. LB Chris Paul Jr., Mississippi
Strengths:
• Natural mover downhill, retreating or side-to-side
• Good pursuit velocity versus outdoors zone and toss performs
• Square, dependable wrap-up tackler
• Quick to acknowledge and set off to the ball
• Can play WILL in 4-3 or MIKE in 3-4
Weaknesses:
• Tape has you wishing he had extra weight on him
• Can get single-blocked by tight ends
61. WR Kyren Lacy, LSU
Strengths:
• Long arms for a large catch radius
• Consistently extends his palms to get the ball within the air
• Long, clean strides at prime velocity
• Shows good footwork on the sidelines
Weaknesses:
• Can have a false step in his launch
• Slower to speed up out of his launch
• Long velocity will not put concern within the hearts of NFL DBs
• Must eradicate drops shifting ahead
62. S Sebastian Castro, Iowa
Strengths:
• Has the power to line up 1-on-1 vs. TEs
• Reliable and relentless run defender
• Decently fast footwork/hips for change of course and acceleration
• Powerful tackler who can impression even the largest ball carriers
• High soccer IQ; not often out of place
Weaknesses:
• Shorter arms do make it more durable to get off blocks
• Footwork is fast, however prime velocity is restricted
• Struggles to reflect a number of the higher athletes within the slot
63. WR Tre Harris, Mississippi
Strengths:
• Not a really various route runner, however in the event you ask him to get vertical, he can try this
• Good contact steadiness and power for yards after the catch
Weaknesses:
• Slow toes out of his launch
• Slow acceleration for build-up velocity
• Does not get off press in addition to a participant of his dimension would counsel
• Creates separation through power and push-offs greater than subtlety and savviness
64. DI Alfred Collins, Texas
Strengths:
• Great size for an inside participant
• Strong higher physique with a imply long-arm transfer
• Violent, sturdy palms
• Good power to combat by means of double groups
• Devastating push-pull power
Weaknesses:
• Slow pursuit velocity for something outdoors the tackles
• Pad stage is of course excessive
• Can let OL get their palms inside on him first
65. G Tyler Booker, Alabama
Strengths:
• Well-built guard with NFL dimension
• Weight distribution provides him a ton of energy in his decrease half to displace and anchor
• Great leg drive to maneuver linemen in opposition to their will
• Strong palms and core to not disengage after strikes and counters
• Imposing double staff blocker
• Feet are faster than common, particularly for his dimension
• Impressive recuperate potential; huge base even post-snap
• Good eyes for stunts and delayed blitzes
• Finisher’s mentality
Weaknesses:
• Balance may be off at occasions. Sometimes, it is an excessive amount of on his heels, and different occasions, an excessive amount of on his toes
• Faster DL can assault one shoulder too simply
66. QB Garrett Nussmeier, LSU
Strengths:
• Adequate NFL arm power
• Has a watch for the deep go; fearless to take large photographs
• Natural passer who can ship passes with zip and accuracy even with out a throwing platform
Weaknesses:
• Lack of expertise exhibits up in being late to reads
• Too snug retreating to keep away from strain
• Too unfastened together with his decrease physique mechanics
67. DI Dontay Corleone, Cincinnati
Strengths:
• Impressive hand velocity and placement to win reps persistently
• Good pure leverage, low pads
• Powerful decrease physique
• Quick first step to shoot gaps
• Good eyes in run protection to know when to shed
Weaknesses:
• Height hints at his arm size being beneath common
• Needs extra pass-rush strikes/counters past energy rush
• Lack of arm size hurts the velocity through which he can shed blockers
68. T Jonah Savaiinaea, Arizona
Strengths:
• Wide, low base for a pre-snap stance
• Footwork velocity could be very fast
• Good core power and steadiness
• Good hand quickness for preliminary punch and restoration/hand preventing
• Strong leg drive for displacement within the run sport
Weaknesses:
• Arm size seems properly beneath common for OTs
• Could use extra energy at punch
• Lack of arm size makes it simpler to get throughout his face clear
• Must anticipate higher to reflect go rushers/stunts
• Stride size on kick slides is restricted
69. CB Zy Alexander, LSU
Strengths:
• Experienced man protection defender who’s assured in press approach
• 14 profession interceptions and a compelled incompletion proportion above 10% in 4 straight seasons
• Experience hand preventing and persistently disrupting receivers all through the route
• Does job of anticipating actions from press
• Knows tips on how to learn the eyes of the receiver and anticipate the ball together with his again turned
• Willing tackler with a really low missed deal with price
Weaknesses:
• Not essentially the most explosive or twitchy athlete within the class, however he isn’t a legal responsibility by any means
• Top velocity vs. vertical receivers is above common however not within the nice class
• Footwork may very well be cleaned up; he does not need to get his heels so shut collectively
70. WR Kobe Hudson, UCF
Strengths:
• Runs routes like a degree guard crossing somebody up
• Will tempo his routes and releases to arrange defenders
• When he remembers to get his palms concerned, he is an efficient hand fighter
Weaknesses:
• Too inconsistent with hand preventing
• Top velocity seems common at finest for the NFL stage (lacks a separation gear)
71. WR Jalen Royals, Utah State
Strengths:
• Strong palms on the catch level
• Consistently extends his palms to assault the ball within the air
• Nuanced route runner who exhibits consciousness of various speeds
• Strong vs. press with launch bundle
• Long velocity is common for the NFL stage
• Will bounce off low/ankle tackles for YAC
Weaknesses:
• Acceleration may be cold and hot
• Great at contested catches however has lots of follow with an absence of separation
72. T Charles Grant, William & Mary
Strengths:
• Explosive out of his stance
• Balanced and coordinated on the hoof
• Flexible decrease half for lengthy stretches/strides in go units
• Good core power (wrestling) to stay in blocks regardless of twists from DL
• Can offer you a pleasant pop at first punch
Weaknesses:
• Lacks some sand within the pants for anchoring and leg drive
• Can battle when linemen deliver extra energy in opposition to him
73. DI Deone Walker, Kentucky
Strengths:
• Very fast first step for a participant of his dimension
• Has a baseline for quite a lot of pass-rush strikes
• Has the size to play 4-3 DE
• Hand utilization is fast regardless of his very lengthy size
• Good pure energy in his higher physique
Weaknesses:
• Not lots of weight in his decrease half regardless of 350 lbs; ankles/calves are skinny
• High-waisted construct makes it more durable for him to sit down in his stance with leverage/energy
• Pops up rapidly out of his stance
74. CB Maxwell Hairston, Kentucky
Strengths:
• Solid wrap-up tackler
• Shows understanding of run-fit duties
• Height and size are above common for the place
• Adequate velocity and acceleration
Weaknesses:
• Hands get fairly grab-y when he will get in bother
• Lacks true anticipation; can look uncontrolled at occasions with turns and steps
• High INTs have been extra opportunistic than true ball expertise and anticipation
75. S Lathan Ransom, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Good dimension and size to cowl quite a lot of defenders
• Flipping hips, footwork is clean in protection
• Very good vary in protection and pursuit
• Doesn’t draw back from taking over blocks; took his physicality to a different stage in 2024
Weaknesses:
• Build is slender to tackle greater ball carriers, although he does have good weight
• Has the eyes to play within the field however can get pushed round
76. LB Jeffrey Bassa, Oregon
Strengths:
• Good athlete who’s assigned slot-coverage duties versus tight ends
• Long arms are best when tacking on blockers and sustaining distance
• Fast to the sideline however maintains sq. shoulders when tackling
• Long arms make for an extended tackling radius and simpler wrap-ups
• Plays with an angle (in a great way)
• Pretty superior really feel/potential in protection with a security background
Weaknesses:
• Slender construct would get picked on by pulling linemen
77. QB Drew Allar, Penn State
Strengths:
• NFL starter body in top and weight
• Easy arm power; ball comes out with NFL-level tempo
• Fundamentally sound follow-through for tight spiral and quick ball velocity
• Fluid footwork for 3-, 5-, 7-step drops
• Makes safety calls on the line of scrimmage
• Accuracy improved from 2023-2024
Weaknesses:
• Mobility is ample for a giant QB however beneath common total
• Accuracy is best in 2024, however true ball placement continues to be inconsistent
• Touch is enhancing, however he nonetheless wants progress with how sturdy of an arm he has
• Accuracy points/TWPs come from being late on his reads
78. TE Eli Stowers, Vanderbilt
Strengths:
• Big catch radius with an above-average wingspan
• Explosive participant with good acceleration and prime velocity
• Excellent trick play passer with QB background
Weaknesses:
• Conscious of getting lively palms however can nonetheless be engaged on punch timing as a blocker
• Still seems to be somewhat uncoordinated in his routes (new to TE)
79. S Xavier Watts, Notre Dame
Strengths:
• Twitchy actions
• Good man protection motion expertise
• Tackling fundamentals aren’t as unhealthy as missed deal with price in 2023 would point out
• nice really feel for the place the ball goes to make large impacts within the passing sport
Weaknesses:
• Very excessive missed deal with price in 2023 (not as excessive as earlier seasons)
• Movements can really feel too frenetic with wasted steps
80. TE Harold Fannin Jr., Bowling Green
Strengths:
• Good playmaker mentality when the ball is in his palms
• Decent burst for his dimension
• Balanced for yards after contact
• Strong palms on the catch level
• Move tight finish who can play within the slot or outdoors as an “X”
• Undersized however aggressive as a blocker in run blocking
Weaknesses:
• Movements can look a bit lumbering
• Slow to cease and begin when altering course
• Lateral stiffness limits pass-blocking potential
81. S Nick Emmanwori, South Carolina
Strengths:
• Imposing dimension for a MOF defender or slot participant
• Explosive participant for his dimension with good prime velocity due to lengthy strides
• Low missed deal with proportion as a starter
• Long arms for a giant deal with radius
• Put himself in a significantly better place to make large performs in 2024
Weaknesses:
• A waisted construct makes it more durable to alter course
• Needs to proceed to develop a really feel for tips on how to play his house — pursuit angles may be misjudged
82. DI Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Strengths:
• Has good arm size for an inside participant
• Fast palms off the snaps to get inside and dictate first strikes
• Push-pull and arm-over strikes are very pure and clean
Weaknesses:
• Build is of course somewhat high-waisted
• At his present weight, he’s lighter within the decrease half
• Club transfer may use some extra violence to it
83. T Marcus Mbow, Purdue
84. G Donovan Jackson, Ohio State
Strengths:
• Very fast off the road and out of his stance
• Anchor approach was improved from 2022 to 2023
• Eyes are all the time scanning for essentially the most harmful menace
• Footwork is quick; can get to the second stage, mirror and wall off in zone
Weaknesses:
• Hands can flail a bit an excessive amount of and be out of place
• Doesn’t have true displacement power for combo blocks
85. ED Tyler Baron, Miami (FL)
Strengths:
• NFL caliber body in each top and weight
• Slightly undersized for an NFL edge, however may put extra weight in his decrease half
• Good pure athlete with steadiness, power and velocity
• Consistent leg drive for bull rushes and getting off blocks
Weaknesses:
• Too many snaps the place he has a false begin or does not hearth off his entrance foot
• Pass rush strikes lack precision and objective proper now
• Needs to develop extra counters to get off blocks faster
86. G Tate Ratledge, Georgia
Strengths:
• Impressive footwork in go professional to remain balanced and robust whereas shuffling
• Hands finally get inside persistently
• Good grip power to take care of blocks
• Adequate leg drive for the pro-level
• Good approach when combo blocking
• Good first-step quickness and coordination for climbing and zone-blocking
Weaknesses:
• The aiming level for his palms may be huge on the first punch
• Sometimes, he simply tries to overpower together with his higher physique (he is been higher in 2024)
87. ED Quandarrius Robinson, Alabama
Strengths:
• Ideal top and size for edge place on the professional stage
• Length provides him a bonus with stack-and-shed (particularly in opposition to TEs)
• Most snug speeding from a two-point stance
Weaknesses:
• Lack of weight/leverage exhibits up in unfavorable run protection performs
• Can be gradual off the ball/snap
• Lacks top-level flexibility/bend
• Still uncooked in total anticipation and go rush strikes/timing
88. S Jonas Sanker, Virginia
Strengths:
• Embraces the bodily necessities to play the sport on the professional stage
• Good athlete for the place within the NFL
• Versatile security who can play 2-high and within the slot
• Decently low missed deal with price over the past two seasons
• Quick to acknowledge the place the ball goes out of the backfield to come back downhill
• Fundamental tackler who packs a punch when his shoulder hits you with velocity
Weaknesses:
• Can have over-aggressive and inconsistent pursuit angles to the ball when coming from depth
• Has reps the place he is overzealous to run downhill and might overlook his protection assignments
89. WR Tory Horton, Colorado State
Strengths:
• Really good route runner for his dimension
• Very sturdy palms, even by means of contact
• Hands are up and able to combat to get off press/contact
• Long strides result in a pleasant top-speed
Weaknesses:
• Slender construct means he can get moved off his routes simpler
• Top velocity takes some time to get to
90. HB Bhayshul Tuten, Virginia Tech
No information accessible
91. CB Mello Dotson, Kansas
Strengths:
• Has some good twitch and C.O.D. motion potential
• Nice restoration velocity
• Oily hips
• Keeps his shoulder sq. when lining up tackles; not reckless in strategy
• Smooth footwork in shuffle
• Good stop-and-start management and explosiveness
Weaknesses:
• Can get pushed off the road in press in opposition to greater receivers
• Foot velocity may very well be sooner, extra exact and able to explode
92. T Blake Miller, Clemson
Strengths:
• Really spectacular motion expertise; explosive, fast, balanced
• Hands are up and lively, but in addition affected person
• Precise together with his actions, continually sq. to his defender
• High IQ participant who’s acutely aware of approach and angles
• Impressive core power to take care of blocks
Weaknesses:
• Lower weight does make him simpler to maneuver
• A lighter body makes him vulnerable to push-pull strikes, even from lighter edge gamers
93. CB Azareye’h Thomas, Florida State
Strengths:
• Constant pre-snap communicator, at the same time as a nook
• Punch in press can actually jolt receivers again; palms are quick and violent
• Good blitzer; does not give it away, fast first step, lengthy arms up in passing lane
• Competitiveness is clear in each sport
• Good baseline of instincts in man and zone that may get even higher
• Adequate athlete for the NFL stage
• Appears to course of the sport at a excessive stage
Weaknesses:
• Can get taken for a trip versus pulling blockers and tight ends
• Doesn’t have uncommon stop-and-start potential for an extended nook
• Slender construct may use extra weight; exhibits up when tackling
• Athleticism is not a deal-breaker, but it surely does appear to be common
94. WR Antwane Wells Jr., Mississippi
Strengths:
• Good mixture of dimension and velocity
• Strong on the catchy level, particularly down the sector
• Strong core and steadiness for yards after the catch/contact
• Explosive first step for releases and acceleration after the catch
Weaknesses:
• Routes are extra rounded than crisp
• Most of his route tree is vertical
• Inconsistent blocker
• Too snug settling for contested catch conditions
95. ED Josaiah Stewart, Michigan
Strengths:
• Not afraid to be bodily regardless of a smaller stature
• All-around explosive athlete
• Can assault each shoulders when aligned huge
• Strong run defender through leverage and energy
Weaknesses:
• Looks like his body is maxed out at lighter weight
• Lack of stride size impression pursuit
• Can be dealt with, strength-wise, one-on-one vs. TEs
• Still engaged on precision of palms with rush strikes
• Needs extra nuance/timing together with his inside cross
96. HB DJ Giddens, Kansas State
Strengths:
• Physically gifted participant that can go the “off the bus take a look at” in top and weight
• Has the body to carry up in go professional
• Has fairly pure palms as a receiver
• Good steadiness for his dimension to bounce off tackles
Weaknesses:
• Slower to anticipate precisely what transfer to make as a runner and go blocker
• Not a “getaway” athlete for the professional stage
97. C Parker Brailsford, Alabama
Strengths:
• Quickness and explosiveness are enormous benefits
• Foot quickness to angle/wall off is pretty much as good because it will get
• Hand quickness/hand preventing is spectacular in velocity and precision
• Plays with way more energy than anticipated for his weight
• Excellent use of leverage and what size he has to power DL momentum upward
• Very spectacular grip power
Weaknesses:
• Maintaining blocks in opposition to IDL on the NFL stage shall be a bother
98. HB Ollie Gordon, Oklahoma State
Strengths:
• Ideal NFL dimension
• Impressive prime velocity for a giant again; ample for the professionals
• Feet are nimble behind the LOS, particularly for his dimension
• Has the steadiness and power to brush off arm tackles and decrease the shoulder
Weaknesses:
• Good dimension and willingness for go blocking, however not essentially sound (will chop block, lunge with shoulder, head dips, and so on)
• More of a build-up velocity runner than an explosive one
• A bit stiff when requested to stop-start or change course
• Vision/anticipation for house/blocks may be spotty
99. HB Kyle Monangai, Rutgers
Strengths:
• Mentality is to by no means go down on first contact
• Explosive in brief areas; good motion expertise for man/hole schemes
• Dense muscle mass that packs a punch when he lowers the shoulder
• Will erase individuals in go professional
Weaknesses:
• Long velocity is common for the NFL stage
• Shorter arms make go professional extra of a problem, however he has the power and mentality for it
• Almost no expertise as a go catcher
100. G Ar’maj Reed-Adams, Texas A&M
Strengths:
• Has the load/size to be a swing OL
• Good core power for steadiness and walling off defenders
• Grip power is powerful, dependable
• Finisher’s mentality: doesn’t let up till the whistle is blown
• Footwork is fast, the bottom is huge and robust
• Quick to get his eyes in the appropriate spot
Weaknesses:
• Build is a bit high-waisted, more durable to get his butt down
• Lacks some pop at contact however has good leg drive after
