New Delhi:
Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna has recused himself from listening to petitions in opposition to a regulation eradicating the holder of India’s highest judicial publish from a panel appointing the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners. The matter was despatched to a different bench and hearings will start January 6.
Chief Justice Khanna – then a Justice of the Supreme Court – was a part of the two-judge bench that started listening to these petitions in March and subsequently handed an interim order. Now, nonetheless, Mr Khanna mentioned it’s a “totally different situation”, referring to his appointment as Chief Justice final month.
Last yr the Supreme Court – in a judgement meant to insulate the Election Commission from interference by the Legislature – mentioned Chief Election and Election Commissioners can be appointed by a three-member panel of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice.
However, months later the federal government launched and handed – in a Winter Session of Parliament at the same time as many of the opposition was suspended – the Chief Election Commissioner and different Election Commissioners Bill, which dropped the CJI in favour of a union minister to be named by the PM.
READ | Bill To Appoint Top 3 Poll Officers Passed In Lok Sabha, Clears Parliament
The transfer was challenged – days earlier than the April-June federal election by opposition politicians, just like the Congress’ Jaya Thakur, and civil society teams, such because the Association for Democratic Reforms.
Then-Justice Khanna and Justice Dipankar Datta refused to remain the brand new regulation.
READ | Top Court Refuses To Stay Law To Appoint Election Commissioners
All of this performed out when the Election Commission had two vacancies; Election Commissioner Arun Goel resigned in March, days after his colleague, Anup Chandra Pandey, additionally stepped down. That left solely Chief Election Commissioner Rajiv Kumar on the panel with the Lok Sabha ballot simply weeks away.
The modified guidelines to nominate election commissioners had been red-flagged by the opposition, which accused the ruling social gathering of a “systematic decimation” of presidency establishments. Critics of the brand new regulation – which changed the Chief Justice – demanded his/her inclusion to stability out any potential battle of curiosity that is likely to be raised by the presence of politicians on the appointment panel.
READ | Petition In Top Court To Restrain Centre From Appointing Poll Officers
The authorities, in the meantime, opposed any challenges to, or court-ordered keep on, its regulation, arguing that such measures had been politically motivated and “created solely on foundation of unsupported and pernicious statements”. Individuals holding excessive workplace, it mentioned, are “presumed to behave pretty”.
READ | “Petitioner Trying To Create Row”: Centre Defends ECs’ Appointment
The controversy over the CEC Bill didn’t, nonetheless, cease the federal government from naming replacements to Mr Goel and Mr Pandey; Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu had been appointed as an alternative.
NDTV is now accessible on WhatsApp channels. Click on the hyperlink to get all the newest updates from NDTV in your chat.